In-N-Out Shake vs DQ Blizzard

Comparison

In-N-Out ShakeStatDQ Blizzard
6.3CR Score6.5
4.00/5Avg rating4.50/5
1Ratings1
NoLimited timeNo
610 kcalCalories690 kcal
16gProtein15g
30gFat26g
74gCarbs101g
Winner

Vote

0 votes

Want to say why? (optional)

DQ Blizzard Reviews

  • ChainGang01

    ★★★★

    FIRE

    About as good as it gets for whatever genre of dessert thing this is. Only to be slightly outdone by the Concrete Mixer at Culver's, and thats just a personal taste thing.

The verdict

Both the In-N-Out Shake and DQ Blizzard offer unique dessert experiences, with the shake being a thick, real ice cream option and the Blizzard featuring a mix of soft serve with various candy or cookie add-ins. Reviewers appreciate the hand-made quality of the In-N-Out Shake, while the Blizzard is noted for its iconic status and mix-in versatility.

In-N-Out Shake

Pros

  • + Made with real ice cream, providing a thick and creamy texture — reviewers appreciate its hand-made quality.
  • + Lower in calories compared to the Blizzard, with 610 kcal.

Cons

  • − Limited flavor options with only chocolate, vanilla, and strawberry available — some may prefer more variety.
  • − No recent user reviews to gauge current opinions.

DQ Blizzard

Pros

  • + Iconic fast food dessert known for its mix-in options, making it versatile and customizable — reviewers mention its popularity.
  • + Higher average user rating of 4.50/5 from reviews.

Cons

  • − Higher calorie count at 690 kcal, which may be a concern for some.
  • − Made with soft serve rather than real ice cream, which some may find less appealing.

Which should you pick?

Pick the In-N-Out Shake if…

  • • You prefer a real ice cream shake experience — reviewers appreciate the hand-made quality.
  • • You want a lower calorie option — the In-N-Out Shake has 610 kcal.

Pick the DQ Blizzard if…

  • • You enjoy customizable desserts with mix-ins — the Blizzard offers a variety of options.
  • • You prefer a dessert with a higher average user rating — the Blizzard has a 4.50/5 rating.

People also compared